The "Journal of the Philosophy of Social Science" (Philosophy of the Social Sciences, POS) has a profound academic influence, providing an important communication platform for philosophical discussions in the field of social sciences. This journal not only gathers scholars from around the world, promoting the exchange of ideas across different cultures and academic backgrounds, but also encourages interdisciplinary dialogue to explore deep-seated issues in social sciences.The topics covered by the journal are extensive, ranging from the methodological foundations of social science research to the interpretation of social phenomena from a philosophical perspective, from the exploration of the relationship between the individual and society to the evolution of social science theories. POS pays particular attention to the debate between individualism and holism in social sciences, a debate that touches on core issues in social science research, such as the interaction between individual behavior and social structure, and the philosophical basis for explanation and prediction in social sciences.In addition, POS also focuses on the diversity and complexity of rationality in social sciences, exploring the manifestations of rationality in different social and cultural contexts, and how rationality affects social decision-making and policy formulation. By publishing high-quality research papers, POS aims to promote in-depth development of the philosophy of social sciences, providing new perspectives and theoretical tools for understanding and solving complex issues in social sciences.
社会科学哲学(Philosophy Of The Social Sciences)是一本由SAGE出版的一本Multiple学术刊物,主要报道Multiple相关领域研究成果与实践。本刊已入选、社会科学引文索引(SCIE)来源期刊,该刊创刊于1971年,出版周期4 issues/year。2021-2022年最新版WOS分区等级:Q4,2023年发布的影响因子为0.6,CiteScore指数2.1,SJR指数0.466。本刊非开放获取期刊。 《社会科学哲学》期刊(Philosophy of the Social Sciences, POS)以其深远的学术影响力,为社会科学领域的哲学探讨提供了一个重要的交流平台。这本期刊不仅汇集了来自世界各地的学者,促进了不同文化和学术背景下的思想交流,而且鼓励跨学科的对话,以探索社会科学中的深层次问题。期刊所涵盖的主题广泛,从社会科学研究的方法论基础到哲学视角下的社会现象解读,从个体与社会的关系探讨到社会科学理论的演变历程。POS尤其关注社会科学中的个体主义与整体主义之争,这一辩论触及社会科学研究中的核心议题,如个体行为与社会结构的相互作用,以及社会科学解释与预测的哲学基础。此外,POS还关注社会科学中理性的多样性和复杂性,探讨理性在不同社会和文化背景下的表现形式,以及理性如何影响社会决策和政策制定。通过发表高质量的研究论文,POS旨在推动社会科学哲学的深入发展,为理解和解决社会科学中的复杂问题提供新的视角和理论工具。
Model Pluralism
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119894897
Is Social Ontology Prior to Social Scientific Methodology?
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119840328
The Essential Ambiguity of the Social
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393118821185
Formal versus Bounded Norms in the Psychology of Rationality: Toward a Multilevel Analysis of Their Relationship
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119842786
Free Will, Determinism and the “Problem” of Structure and Agency in the Social Sciences
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393118814952
Science as Gift, or Knowledge as the Offer That Cannot be Refused: Introducing Russian Science and Technology Studies
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119882112
Verstehen Naturalized
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119847102
Science, Common Sense and Sociological Analysis: A Critical Appreciation of the Epistemological Foundation of Field Theory
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393118819823
A Dialogue on Understanding
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119847106
Is Verstehen Scientific Understanding?
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119847104
The Ubiquity of Understanding: Dimensions of Understanding in the Social and Natural Sciences
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119847103
What Can Mechanisms Do for You? Mechanisms and the Problem of Confounders in the Social Sciences
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119840775
Institutions as a Philosophical Problem: A Critical Rationalist Perspective on Guala’s “Understanding Institutions” and His Critics
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393118810820
Institutions, Ideology, and Nonideal Social Ontology
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393118823265
Redundant Group Agency
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119847273
Humanities-as-Technique: New Images of Knowledge and Ontological Construction
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119864695
Universities as Social Background in “Trading Zone” Creation
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119863380
Qualitative Research Methods and Evidential Reasoning
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119862858
The Problem of Analytic Philosophy*
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119853246
The Limited Rationality of Technology *
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393118814765
Knowing as a Subversive Activity: A Conversation with Steve Fuller’s Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game *
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393118814763
New Trading Zones in Contemporary Universities
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119864697
Naturalism and the Problem of Normativity: The Case of Historiography
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119842787
Gift versus Trade: On the Culture of Science Communication
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119864698
Human Rights and Status Functions, before and after the Enlightenment
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393118811574
Testing Political Philosophies
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393119835159
Classical Cybernetics and Transhumanism: A Reply to Richmond’s Review of The Nature of the Machine and the Collapse of Cybernetics
来源期刊:Philosophy of the Social SciencesDOI:10.1177/0048393118811308