The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology aims at promoting the quality of clinical and patient-oriented health care research through the advancement and application of innovative methods of:conducting and presenting primary research;synthesizing research results;disseminating results;and translating results into optimal clinical practice;
《临床流行病学杂志》旨在通过以下创新方法的进步和应用来提高临床和以病人为中心的卫生保健研究的质量：开展和介绍初级研究;综合研究成果;传播成果;并将结果转化为最佳临床实践;
The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation
来源期刊：Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.016
GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.011
The selection of comparators for randomized controlled trials of health-related behavioral interventions: recommendations of an NIH expert panel.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.011
Systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines: a methodological guide.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.030
Increased risks for random errors are common in outcomes graded as high certainty of evidence.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.009
GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.025
Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used hip-, knee-, foot-, and ankle-specific questionnaires: a systematic review.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.017
Minor differences were found between AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS in the assessment of systematic reviews including both randomized and nonrandomized studies.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.004
A scoping review provided a framework for new ways of doing research through mobilizing collective intelligence.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.007
Randomized trials involving surgery did not routinely report considerations of learning and clustering effects.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.004
Firm human evidence on harms of endocrine-disrupting chemicals was unlikely to be obtainable for methodological reasons.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.005
Half of Systematic reviews about pain registered in PROSPERO were not published and the majority had inaccurate status.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.08.010
The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.015
GRADE guidelines 27: How to calculate absolute effects for time-to-event outcomes in Summary of Findings tables and Evidence Profiles.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.015
A systematic review describes models for recruitment prediction at the design stage of a clinical trial.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.002
Overview authors rarely defined systematic reviews that are included in their overviews.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.004
Potentially missing data are considerably more frequent than definitely missing data: a methodological survey of 638 randomized controlled trials.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.001
Most noninferiority trials were not designed to preserve active comparator treatment effects.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.003
An observational study found large methodological heterogeneity in systematic reviews addressing prevalence and cumulative incidence.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.003
Model-based economic evaluations of diagnostic point of care tests were rarely fit for purpose.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.003
Conference abstracts describing systematic reviews on pain were selectively published, not reliable, and poorly reported.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.011
New evidence for concern over the risk of birth defects from medications for nausea and vomitting of pregnancy.
来源期刊：Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyDOI：10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2019.07.014
Using Health Insurance Reimbursement Data to Identified Incident Cancer Cases.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.009
Tailored meta-analysis: an investigation of the correlation between the test positive rate and prevalence
来源期刊：Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.013
Consideration of confounding was suboptimal in the reporting of observational studies in psychiatry: a meta-epidemiological study.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.002
A common framework of steps and criteria for prioritizing topics for evidence syntheses: a systematic review.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.009
PROMIS 4-Item Measures and Numeric Rating Scales Efficiently Assess SPADE Symptoms Compared to Legacy Measures.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.018
Software engineering principles address current problems in the systematic review ecosystem.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.014
Decision analytic modelling was useful to assess the impact of a prediction model on health outcomes before a randomized trial.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.010
Harms are assessed inconsistently and reported inadequately Part 2: nonsystematic adverse events.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.020
The dynamics in health-related quality of life of patients with stable coronary artery disease were revealed: a network analysis.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.022
Methods and reporting of systematic reviews of comparative accuracy were deficient: a methodological survey and proposed guidance
来源期刊：Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.007
A novel superior medication-based chronic disease score predicted all-cause mortality in independent geriatric cohorts.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.004
A benefit-harm analysis of adding basal insulin vs. sulfonylurea to metformin to manage type II diabetes mellitus in people with multiple chronic conditions.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.014
The increasing complexity of the core outcomes landscape.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.016
Defining ranges for certainty ratings of diagnostic accuracy: A GRADE concept paper.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.002
An Approach to Explore for a Sweet-spot in Randomized Trials.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.012
Quality of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) guidelines is suboptimal: an evaluation using the AGREE II instrument.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.007
Patient focused outcomes are infrequently reported in paediatric health information technology trials: A systematic review.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.017
Twenty percent of secondary publications of randomized controlled trials of drugs did not provide new results relative to the primary publication.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.012
The Clinical trial transparency in oncology significantly increased over the recent years.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.018
Validation of five search filters for retrieval of clinical practice guidelines produced low precision.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.022
More consideration was needed when conducting non-randomised studies of interventions.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.027
The moral and legal status of Health Care Workers in Cluster Randomized Trials: A response to Weijer and Taljaard.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.08.005
Getting more out of meta-analyses: a new approach to meta-analysis in light of unexplained heterogeneity.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.023
Characteristics and methods of incorporating randomized and nonrandomized evidence in network meta-analyses: a scoping review.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.023
Empirical evidence of bias arising from patient reported outcome measures in orthopaedics.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.012
Spin or Interpretation Bias in Evaluations of Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.011
Frequent inappropriate use of unweighted summary statistics in systematic reviews of pathogen genotypes or genogroups.
来源期刊：Journal of clinical epidemiologyDOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.009
