Politics, Philosophy & Economics aims to bring moral, economic and political theory to bear on the analysis, justification and criticism of political and economic institutions and public policies. The Editors are committed to publishing peer-reviewed papers of high quality using various methodologies from a wide variety of normative perspectives. They seek to provide a distinctive forum for discussions and debates among political scientists, philosophers, and economists on such matters as constitutional design, property rights, distributive justice, the welfare state, egalitarianism, the morals of the market, democratic socialism, population ethics, and the evolution of norms. Of special interest are essays that are widely accessible. Scholars using more specialized techniques (of social choice theory, for example, or of game theory) are encouraged (and given space) to make their arguments and results more accessible to a broader audience.
政治哲学与经济学(Politics Philosophy & Economics)是一本由SAGE出版的一本Multiple学术刊物,主要报道Multiple相关领域研究成果与实践。本刊已入选、社会科学引文索引(SCIE)来源期刊,该刊创刊于2002年,出版周期4 issues/year。2021-2022年最新版WOS分区等级:Q2,2023年发布的影响因子为1.6,CiteScore指数1.6,SJR指数0.745。本刊非开放获取期刊。 《Politics, Philosophy & Economics》(简称PPE)是一本在国际学术界享有盛誉的杂志,它汇聚了政治学、哲学与经济学三大领域的精华,为读者提供了跨学科的深度分析与独到见解。
Prioritarianism: A response to critics
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X19828022
Deliberative democracy and the problem of tacit knowledge
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X18782086
Territorial boundaries and history
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X18779308
Inequality and inequity in the emergence of conventions
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X19828371
The limits of commodification arguments: Framing, motivation crowding, and shared valuations
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X19825494
International tax competition and justice: The case for global minimum tax rates
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X19848074
Should campaign finance reform aim to level the playing field?
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X19828023
Protecting the entrepreneurial poor: A human rights approach
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X19860235
Do territorial rights include the right to exclude?
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X18788345
Is it unjust that elderly people suffer from poorer health than young people? Distributive and relational egalitarianism on age-based health inequalities
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X19828020
On the claims of unjust institutions
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X18805162
Markets in votes: Alienability, strict secrecy, and political clientelism
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X18809068
Boundaries of Authority: An introduction
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X19889821
Political testimony
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594x18798062
Lockeans versus nationalists on territorial rights
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X18779147
Interpersonal comparisons with preferences and desires
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X19828021
Rights and territories: A reply to Nine, Miller, and Stilz
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X19889419
The weight of fairness
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X19851162
How politically liberal should the capabilities approach want to be?
来源期刊:Politics, Philosophy & EconomicsDOI:10.1177/1470594X19825495