Argumentation is an international and interdisciplinary journal. Its aim is to gather academic contributions from a wide range of scholarly backgrounds and approaches to reasoning, natural inference and persuasion: communication, rhetoric (classical and modern), linguistics, discourse analysis, pragmatics, psychology, philosophy, logic (formal and informal), critical thinking, history and law. Its scope includes a diversity of interests, varying from philosophical, theoretical and analytical to empirical and practical topics. Argumentation publishes papers, book reviews, a yearly bibliography, and announcements of conferences and seminars.To be considered for publication in the journal, a paper must satisfy all of these criteria:1. Report research that is within the journals’ scope: concentrating on argumentation 2. Pose a clear and relevant research question 3. Make a contribution to the literature that connects with the state of the art in the field of argumentation theory 4. Be sound in methodology and analysis 5. Provide appropriate evidence and argumentation for the conclusions 6. Be presented in a clear and intelligible fashion in standard English
《论辩》是一本国际性、跨学科的期刊。它的目的是收集来自广泛的学术背景和推理、自然推理和说服方法的学术贡献:交际学、修辞学(古典和现代)、语言学、话语分析、语用学、心理学、哲学、逻辑学(正式和非正式)、批判性思维、历史和法律。其范围包括各种兴趣,从哲学、理论和分析到经验和实践主题。《论辩》发表论文、书评、年度参考书目、会议和研讨会的公告。要想在该杂志上发表论文,论文必须满足以下所有标准:1.报告期刊范围内的研究:集中于论证3.提出一个明确而相关的研究问题。对与论证理论领域的最新水平相关的文献做出贡献4。在方法论和分析方面是健全的。6.为结论提供适当的证据和论证。用标准英语清晰易懂地表达
Argumentative Style: A Complex Notion
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-019-09478-Y
Populism and Informal Fallacies: An Analysis of Right-Wing Populist Rhetoric in Election Campaigns
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-018-9461-2
Confrontational Maneuvering by Dissociation in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-018-09477-5
How Computational Tools Can Help Rhetoric and Informal Logic with Argument Invention
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-017-9439-5
A Cross-Cultural Study of Argument Orientations of Turkish and American College Students: Is Silence Really Golden and Speech Silver for Turkish Students?
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-019-09483-1
Presumptions, and How They Relate to Arguments from Ignorance
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/s10503-019-09498-8
Plausible Argumentation in Eikotic Arguments: The Ancient Weak Versus Strong Man Example
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-018-9460-3
The Pernicious Effects of Compression Plagiarism on Scholarly Argumentation
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-019-09481-3
Objective Evaluation of Demonstrative Arguments
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-018-9472-Z
Refutational Strategies in Mencius’s Argumentative Discourse on Human Nature
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/s10503-019-09495-x
“I Have No Comment”: Confrontational Maneuvering by Declaring a Standpoint Unallowed or Indisputable in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Regular Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/s10503-019-09504-z
Argument by Analogy in Ancient China
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-018-09475-7
Reconstructing Complex Pro/Con Argumentation
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-018-9467-9
Factors for Evaluating Presumptions and Presumptive Inferences
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-018-9468-8
Old and New Fallacies in Port-Royal Logic
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-018-9470-1
The Thesis of the Effectiveness of Quasi-logical Arguments
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-018-9464-Z
Argumentative Competence in Friend and Stranger Dyadic Exchanges
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-019-09487-X
Theoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberation
来源期刊:ArgumentationDOI:10.1007/S10503-018-09476-6