The journal Assessing Writing is committed to being a leading academic exchange platform in the field of writing assessment. It not only provides educators, test designers, and language education researchers with a space to share and discuss methods and practices of writing assessment but also encourages the introduction of innovative assessment concepts and strategies.The journal pays special attention to the diversity of assessment methods and the effectiveness of assessment practices, emphasizing that assessments should accurately reflect the writer's language abilities, thinking quality, and creative expression. By publishing high-quality research papers, the journal promotes in-depth discussions on writing assessment standards, scoring methods, and feedback mechanisms.
《评估写作》期刊致力于成为写作评估领域内领先的学术交流平台,它不仅为教育工作者、测试设计者、语言教育研究者提供了一个分享和讨论写作评估方法与实践的空间,而且鼓励创新的评估理念和策略的提出。该期刊特别关注评估方法的多样性和评估实践的有效性,强调评估应当能够准确反映写作者的语言能力、思维品质和创造性表达。通过发表高质量的研究论文,期刊促进了对写作评估标准、评分方法、以及反馈机制的深入探讨。
The influence of lexical features on teacher judgements of ESL argumentative essays
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2018.12.003
Assessing student-writers’ self-efficacy beliefs about text revision in EFL writing
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.03.002
Evidence of fairness: Twenty-five years of research in Assessing Writing
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100418
(Re)visiting twenty-five years of writing assessment
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.100419
Unresolved issues in defining and assessing writing motivational constructs: A review of conceptualization and measurement perspectives
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.100417
“I should summarize this whole paragraph”: Shared processes of reading and writing in iterative integrated assessment tasks
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.03.003
Lower English proficiency means poorer feedback performance? A mixed-methods study
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.05.001
Exploring the correspondence between traditional score resolution methods and person fit indices in rater-mediated writing assessments
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2018.12.002
What has been assessed in writing and how? Empirical evidence from Assessing Writing (2000–2018)
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.100421
An investigation of the text features of discrepantly-scored ESL essays: A mixed methods study
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2018.10.003
Source use in the story continuation writing task
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2018.12.001
Developing and examining validity evidence for the Writing Rubric to Inform Teacher Educators (WRITE)
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.03.001
Making our invisible racial agendas visible: Race talk in Assessing Writing, 1994–2018
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100425
Error analysis and diagnosis of ESL linguistic accuracy: Construct specification and empirical validation
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.05.002
Raters’ perceptions of assessment criteria relevance
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.04.002
Affordances and limitations of the ACCUPLACER automated writing placement tool
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.06.004
Affordances of TOEFL writing tasks beyond university admissions
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.06.006
Holistic, local, and process-oriented: What makes the University Utah’s Writing Placement Exam work
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.06.003
Using the Smarter Balanced grade 11 summative assessment in college writing placement
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.06.002
Investigating the effect of source characteristics on task comparability in integrated writing tasks
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.05.003
Directed self-placement as a tool to foreground student agency
来源期刊:Assessing WritingDOI:10.1016/J.ASW.2019.06.001