Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice

Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice

ASSESS EDUC
影响因子:2.2
JCR分区:Q1
新锐分区:教育学2区
是否综述期刊:N/A
是否预警:不在预警名单内
是否OA:
出版国家/地区:-
出版社:Taylor & Francis
发刊时间:0
收录数据库:SCIE/SSCI/Scopus收录
ISSN:0969-594X

期刊介绍

Assessment in Education disciplines Policy&Practice is an authoritative academic journal in the field of assessment, dedicated to publishing high-quality research papers and providing an important platform for academic output in the field of assessment. This magazine is guided by an international perspective and encourages scholars from different evaluation systems and cultural backgrounds to submit papers to promote cross-cultural exchange and cooperation in the field of evaluation. The purpose of the magazine is to explore the commonalities and differences in educational evaluation policies and practices, and to reveal evaluation practices and challenges under different evaluation systems and cultural backgrounds through comparative research and case analysis. This magazine not only focuses on traditional examination and evaluation methods, but also on emerging assessment techniques and methods such as computerized adaptive testing, performance evaluation, etc., to reflect the latest developments and trends in the field of assessment.It ensures that published papers have high quality and academic value through a rigorous peer review process. This journal provides valuable academic resources for researchers, policy makers, and practitioners in the field of evaluation, promoting academic development and practical improvement in the field of evaluation.
《教育评估-原则政策与实践》是评估领域的权威学术期刊,致力于发表高质量的研究论文,为评估领域的学术产出提供了重要的平台。该杂志以国际视野为导向,鼓励来自不同评估体系和文化背景的学者提交论文,以促进评估领域的跨文化交流和合作。杂志的目的在于探索教育评估政策和实践的共性与差异,通过比较研究和案例分析,揭示不同评估体系和文化背景下的评估实践和挑战。该杂志不仅关注传统的考试和评价方法,还关注新兴的评估技术和方法,如计算机化适应性测试、表现性评价等,以反映评估领域的最新动态和趋势。它通过严格的同行评审流程,确保发表的论文具有高质量和学术价值。该杂志为评估领域的研究人员、政策制定者和实践者提供了宝贵的学术资源,促进了评估领域的学术发展和实践改进。
年发文量 15
国人发稿量 0.45
国人发文占比 0.03%
自引率 0%
平均录取率-
平均审稿周期 -
版面费 -
偏重研究方向 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
期刊官网 -
投稿链接 -

期刊高被引文献

Evaluating item response theory linking and model fit for data from PISA 2000–2012
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1586642
Linking errors in international large-scale assessments: calculation of standard errors for trend estimation
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1433633
Exploring the factors teachers consider in determining students’ grades
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1555515
Who makes it into PISA? Understanding the impact of PISA sample eligibility using Turkey as a case study (PISA 2003–PISA 2012)
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1504742
Students’ formative assessment perceptions, feedback use and mathematics performance in secondary schools in Tanzania
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593103
Students with special educational needs within PISA
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1421523
A meta-analysis on the reliability of comparative judgement
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1602027
Conceptualising fairness in classroom assessment: exploring the value of organisational justice theory
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593105
The impact of standards-based assessment on knowledge for history education in New Zealand
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1432564
Cross-cultural comparability of noncognitive constructs in TIMSS and PISA
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1469467
The fairness of internal assessment in the GCSE: the value of students’ accounts
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1619514
The potential of anchoring vignettes to increase intercultural comparability of non-cognitive factors
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1514367
The existence and impact of floor effects for low-performing PISA participants
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1577219
PISA and the globalisation of education: a critical commentary on papers published in AIE special issue 4/2019
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1674244
An investigation into the Sawtooth Effect in secondary school assessments in England
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1513907
Fair assessment viewed through the lenses of measurement theory
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1586643
Pupils’ perceptions of grades: a narrative analysis of stories about getting graded for the first time
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593104
Assessing learning: How can classroom-based teachers assess students’ competencies in numeracy?
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1503156
Assessment design and quality of inferences in PISA: limitations and recommendations for improvement
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1645990
Acts of responding. Teachers’ written comments and students’ text revisions
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1595524
Comparing the influence of various measurement error presentations in test score reports on educational decision-making
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1447908
Formative and summative assessment in Hong Kong primary schools: students’ attitudes matter
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571993
Does a test have to be fair to be valid
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594x.2019.1666229
The use and abuse of assessment
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1689323
Writing assessment, comparative judgement and students’ evaluative expertise
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1577959
Assessment reforms and grading
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1625510
Corrigendum
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594x.2017.1371370
Assessment literacy across contexts and competencies
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1601357
Revising the BioMedical Admissions Test (BMAT) to improve impact and washback for candidates and support fair access to test preparation
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1639133
Complexity of test preparation across three contexts: case studies from Australia, Iran and China
来源期刊:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeDOI:10.1080/0969594x.2019.1700211

质量指标占比

研究类文章占比 OA被引用占比 撤稿占比 出版后修正文章占比
100.00%35.29%--

相关指数

影响因子
影响因子
年发文量
自引率

预警情况

查看说明
时间 预警情况
2026年03月发布的新锐学术版不在预警名单中
2025年03月发布的2025版不在预警名单中
2024年02月发布的2024版不在预警名单中
2023年01月发布的2023版不在预警名单中
2021年12月发布的2021版不在预警名单中
2020年12月发布的2020版不在预警名单中
*来源:中科院《 国际期刊预警名单》

JCR分区

WOS分区等级:1区
版本 按学科 分区
WOS期刊SCI分区
WOS期刊SCI分区
WOS期刊SCI分区是指SCI官方(Web of Science)为每个学科内的期刊按照IF数值排 序,将期刊按照四等分的方法划分的Q1-Q4等级,Q1代表质量最高,即常说的1区期刊。
(2024-2025年最新版)
EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Q1

中科院分区

查看说明
版本 大类学科 小类学科 Top期刊 综述期刊
2026年3月发布
(新锐分区)
教育学2区
EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 教育学和教育研究
2区
N/A
2025年3月升级版
教育学2区
EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 教育学和教育研究
2区
2023年12月旧的升级版
教育学3区
EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 教育学和教育研究
4区

CiteScore

查看说明
CiteScore SJR SNIP 学科 分区 排名
6.30
0.988
1.656
大类:Social Sciences 小类:Education
Q1
191 / 1620

相关文章