Feminist Legal Studies is committed to an internationalist perspective and to the promotion and advancement of feminist scholarship in all areas of law. It aims to publish critical, interdisciplinary, theoretically engaged feminist scholarship relating to law (broadly conceived) and has a particular interest in work that extends feminist debates and analysis by reference to critical and theoretical approaches and perspectives, including postcolonial, transnational and poststructuralist work. Although the focus of the journal is law, the editorial board encourages the submission of papers from people working outside the academy, as well as academics other than lawyers as well as interdisciplinary work addressing the concerns not only of lawyers but others, women and men, interested in feminist work. The editorial board is a collective drawn from feminists working at leading law schools across the UK. A full list of the editorial board can found on the Journal’s website: http://www.springer.com/law/international/journal/10691?detailsPage=editorialBoardAlongside traditional articles and book reviews Feminist Legal Studies is committed to publishing material that challenges conventional forms of academic writing/knowledge and encourages creative approaches to scholarship, analysis and debate. Such material is normally published in our “Creative Content” section (see Instructions for Authors for more details). The board also welcomes proposals for themed issues of the journal.
女权主义法律的研究致力于国际主义的观点,并促进和提高女权主义学术在所有法律领域。它的目的是出版与法律有关的批判性、跨学科、理论性的女权主义学术著作(广义的),并特别关注通过参考批判性和理论性的方法和观点来扩展女权主义辩论和分析的工作,包括后殖民主义、跨国和后结构主义的工作。虽然该杂志的重点是法律,但编辑委员会鼓励学术界以外的工作人员以及律师以外的学术界人士提交论文,并鼓励从事跨学科工作,不仅解决律师的关切,而且解决对女权主义工作感兴趣的其他人、妇女和男子的关切。编辑委员会是一个集体,由在英国各地领先的法学院工作的女权主义者组成。编辑委员会的完整名单可以在《华尔街日报》的网站上找到:http://www.springer.com/law/international/journal/10691?detailsPage= editorialBoardFeminist法律的Studies除了发表传统的文章和书评外,还致力于出版挑战传统学术写作/知识形式的材料,并鼓励以创造性的方式进行学术、分析和辩论。此类材料通常发布在我们的“创意内容”部分(有关详细信息,请参阅作者说明)。董事会还欢迎关于该杂志主题问题的建议。
Relational Vulnerability: The Legal Status of Cohabiting Carers
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/s10691-019-09404-3
Women Peace and Security: Adrift in Policy and Practice
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/S10691-018-9381-4
Gender Injustice in Compensating Injury to Autonomy in English and Singaporean Negligence Law
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/S10691-018-9390-3
Victims, perpetrators and paternalism: image driven sexting laws in Connecticut
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/S10691-019-09407-0
Back at the kitchen table: Reflections on decolonising and internationalising with the Global South socio-legal writing workshops
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/S10691-019-09409-Y
Feminist Scholarship on International Law in the 1990s and Today: An Inter-Generational Conversation
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/S10691-018-9384-1
Concealment of Birth: Time to Repeal a 200-Year-Old “Convenient Stop-Gap”?
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/S10691-019-09401-6
Marital Rape and the Marital Rapist: The 1976 South Australian Rape Law Reforms
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/S10691-018-9382-3
What’s the Deal? Women’s Evidence and Gendered Negotiations
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/S10691-018-9391-2
The EU Top Court Rules that Married Same-Sex Couples Can Move Freely Between EU Member States as “Spouses”: Case C-673/16, Relu Adrian Coman, Robert Clabourn Hamilton, Asociaţia Accept v Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări, Ministerul Afacerilor Interne
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/S10691-019-09397-Z
The Role of Pateman’s Sexual Contract in Beneficial Interests in Property
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/s10691-019-09413-2
International Women’s Day 2019: In Conversation with Harriet Wistrich
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/s10691-019-09411-4
Some reflections on law and gender in modern Ireland
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/s10691-019-09415-0
Vulnerability and the Consenting Subject: Reimagining Informed Consent in Embryo Donation
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/s10691-019-09414-1
The Politics of “Doing Exactly Nothing”: Feminist Legal Change and Bureaucratic Administration of Refugee Protection
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/s10691-019-09410-5
Correction to: Dianne Otto (ed): Queering International Law: Possibilities, Alliances, Complicities, Risks
来源期刊:Feminist Legal StudiesDOI:10.1007/S10691-018-9378-Z